Posts Tagged ‘Affordable solar’

An Installer’s Guide to SREC Sale Strategies

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

by George Ashton

As a residential solar installer, you have without question been challenged by prospective customers regarding the high price tag of solar; a typical residential system (3kW in size) can cost between $18,000 and $24,000. Luckily, there are a number of incentives available at the federal, state, and local levels that you can present to your customers to help them realize that solar can be more affordable than often perceived. Federal and state incentives are relatively easy and straightforward to explain. The concept of selling SRECs, however, is more allusive and harder for customers to grasp.

Because SREC income can significantly improve a project’s economics (reducing costs by 20-40% depending on location) and can increase a customer’s return on investment, ensuring that customers understand their SREC options and take advantage of the sale options available will assist your business with closing more sales. This article provides an overview of SRECs and explains the pros and cons of different SREC sale options.

What Are SRECs?
An SREC is a tradable credit that represents the clean energy benefits of electricity generated from a solar energy system. Each time a solar system generates 1000 kWh (1 MWh) of electricity, an SREC is issued which can be sold or traded separately from the power. SRECs have high value in some states where there is legislation called a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). An RPS requires energy suppliers to either produce solar energy from their own projects or purchase credits from individuals or businesses that own solar energy systems.

How Are SREC Prices Determined?
RPS Compliance fee schedules dictate how much energy suppliers must pay for each SREC they fail to produce or acquire. As a result, SREC prices usually trade at or below the dollar amount of these compliance fees. In some states, the fee remains the same dollar amount year over year while in other states, like New Jersey and Ohio, the fee decreases over time which will result in a decrease of the price for SRECs over time.

SREC Supply
SREC supply will increase in the coming years. As solar panel prices fall, solar will become more affordable and more popular. As more solar systems are installed, more SRECs will be available on the market. Additionally, as credit markets continue to improve, more large projects will become financeable and built, resulting in more SRECs. Both of these trends will put downward pressure on SREC prices.

SREC Demand
SREC demand will also increase in the coming years. The demand for SRECs in a given state is set by RPS legislation that determines the overall number of SRECs energy suppliers are required to acquire each year, and this number quickly increases year over year in every state with an RPS. Because SRECs are a compliance commodity, if there are more SRECs supplied than demanded in a given state market, the pricing for excess SRECs will likely be equivalent to pricing seen on voluntary SREC markets, which today trade at $15-$30 per credit.

What are the Options for Selling SRECs and the Risks of Each Option?
Selling SRECs on the open market is analogous to day trading in the stock market. Your customers may make good money, but there is no certainty with regards to their long-term profitability. If SREC prices fall for any of the reasons mentioned above, they will receive a lot less for their SRECs. This option is best recommended for SREC sellers who do not rely on SREC proceeds to pay for the cost of a solar energy system and have a little extra time on their hands to monitor the market.

Selling SRECs into a long-term contract can be a strategy that provides adequate returns, but with less risk than selling on the open market. A typical long-term contract offers a fixed price per SREC for a 3-5 year term. By choosing this option, your customers will know exactly how much income they will receive over the contract term. However, the true value of a long-term SREC offer depends heavily on what supports that offer.

The most secure offers come directly from energy suppliers as they are the ultimate purchasers of all compliance eligible SRECs. However, very few energy suppliers offer contracts directly to non-commercial system owners. The next best offer is a contract from a select few SREC companies that back up their promises to purchase SRECs with their own long-term contracts to sell those SRECs to energy suppliers. These SREC companies have negotiated to sell your SRECs to energy suppliers at a specific price for 3-10 years at a time and can pass that guarantee on to you. Beware of SREC companies offering long-term contracts that have not negotiated fixed price long-term contracts to sell SRECs. If they have nothing to support their promises, and the market price falls, it will be difficult for them to honor your customer’s contracts.

Selling your SRECs for an upfront, lump sum payment is the SREC market’s version of a risk free investment; the return is a noticeably lower than the other options, but there is absolutely no risk. With this option, you will sell the rights to your future SRECs in exchange for a discounted one-time payment received close to the date of installation. You keep that money regardless of what happens to SREC markets. This option is recommended for solar energy system owners that are risk averse or having trouble with accessing financing through banks.

Educating your customers on all three SREC sale options and helping them evaluate their risk tolerance and financial needs will be a key strategy to selling more solar energy systems. The metrics presented in this article should help you identify the best route for your customers. Regardless of which option a customer chooses, monetizing their SRECs will play a critical role in financing their solar energy system.

George Ashton is Vice President and CFO of Sol Systems, a solar energy finance company located in Washington DC.

  • Share/Bookmark

Solar Energy Gets Cheaper Than Nuclear Energy

Friday, August 6th, 2010

The steady decline in solar photovoltaic system costs is helping solar electricity become cheaper than electricity from new nuclear power plants. In a recent report titled “Solar and Nuclear Costs – The Historic Crossover (1), Dr. John O Blackburn and Sam Cunningham of Duke University makes a strong case for utilities to adopt a distributed model of electricity generation. The study indicates that the cost of solar electricity is expected to reduce from 14 cents per kilowatt-hour in 2010 to 7.5 cents per kilowatt-hour in 2020 while nuclear-generated electricity will be 12-20 cents per kilowatt-hour. Moreover, rooftop solar plants can be installed in a few days whereas construction of a new nuclear plant can take up to 6 years.

Some solar critics argue that solar electricity is only affordable because of government tax benefits. While this may be true, nuclear also benefits from government aid – in the form of government backed insurance and loan guarantees. Meanwhile, the rapid cost decline of solar technology will help solar electricity reach grid parity by 2020. In contrast, nuclear power is yet to be cost competitive despite being operational for the last 40 years.

The power industry and the energy economy are undergoing a paradigm shift from a centralized power source to a more “distributed” power model. A 2007 report by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) (2) shows that 77% of new energy service demand is met by energy efficiency. These energy efficiency gains and most of solar supply are located in residential homes. The combination of energy efficiency, wind generation, solar water heating and solar photovoltaic technology has challenged the traditional model of centralized power generation.

__________
(1) http://www.ncwarn.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/NCW-SolarReport_final1.pdf

(2) ACEEE, “ A White Paper prepared for the Energy Efficient Finance Forum”

  • Share/Bookmark

The Status of PACE Loans

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Since their inception in 2008 in California, Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) loans have provided homeowners and businesses with the upfront financing necessary to implement energy efficiency retrofits as well as the installation of solar arrays. These loans are funded by municipal bonds at low interest rates and, in general, have a payback term of 20 years. Another benefit for borrowers is that they are only required to make payments on the loan annually through an increase in their property tax. In theory, the borrowers should gain more in combined energy savings throughout the year than they must pay out at the end of the year. As such, the idea quickly caught on with states across the country including Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia, all of which created their own PACE programs.

However, on July 6th, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) stated that these loans “present significant risk to lenders and secondary market entities, may alter valuations for mortgage-backed securities and are not essential for successful programs to spur energy conservation.”i The FHFA have taken this position because PACE loans are senior liens on a borrowers’ property, which means they take precedence over other mortgages. The FHFA oversees Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and the organization believes this senior lien presents a risk to their mortgage portfolio. Currently, all PACE programs have been put on hold until further notice.

The FHFA needs to understand that PACE is a key component to the successful implementation of a sophisticated domestic energy policy. Many stakeholders have voiced their concern are trying to reverse or sidestep the FHFA’s resistance to the program. The State of California has filed a lawsuit against the FHFA, while numerous senators have introduced legislation that could potentially save PACE funding. Hopefully, they will prevail, since the program is a great way to create growth in the renewable energy sector and does not burden the borrower with high interest rates like many other lending opportunities. The most promising option appears to be a compromise in which the FHFA allows for a “pilot project” of between 10,000 – 300,000 homes to test out their concern over the perceived risk of this financing option.ii If approved, the success of this test cycle could lead to an increase in funding for solar energy systems.

_______________________
i Werthan, Jeffrey. “Federal Housing Finance Agency Warns About PACE Loans; Warning Communicated by FDIC,” Corporate Financial Weekly Digest < http://www.corporatefinancialweeklydigest.com/2010/07/articles/banking/federal-housing-finance-agency-warns-about-pace-loans-warning-communicated-by-fdic/>
ii Hiskes, Jonathan. “Fate of PACE clean-energy programs about to become clearer.” < http://www.grist.org/article/2010-07-20-fate-of-pace-clean-energy-programs-about-to-become-clearer/>

  • Share/Bookmark

Sol Systems and Clean Currents Announce SREC Partnership

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Sol Systems and Clean Currents, two pioneers in distributed solar energy finance and development, have partnered together. The collaborative partnership between Sol Systems and Clean Currents ensures more prospective solar energy system owners across the mid-Atlantic will have access to SREC financing, which makes generating solar energy both affordable and simple. “With Clean Currents’ accomplishments in context, it is a great honor for Sol Systems to announce this collaborative partnership” said Sol Systems CEO, Yuri Horwitz. Under the new partnership, Sol Systems will work with Clean Currents to ensure their customers continue to receive the highest value for the sale of their SRECs.

Clean Currents is a leading independent solar energy installer and clean energy broker, operating in the mid-Atlantic region. Clean Currents provides a diverse array of services, ranging from solar installations to power switch agreements for homeowners and businesses. Recently, Clean Currents provided Sol Systems with a Wind Renewable Energy Credit (REC) purchasing agreement that offset Sol Team’s entire business and personal carbon footprint. Clean Currents has been honored with such awards as the Maryland Green Company of the Year in 2010 and the DC Mayor’s Environmental Excellence Award in 2009. For more information about Clean Currents, please visit www.cleancurrents.com.

Sol Systems is a Washington D.C. based solar energy finance and development firm. With more than 1,000 customers across 13 states, Sol Systems has become a critical player in developing SREC markets and financing solar energy systems. Sol Systems currently offers long-term, fixed price SREC contracts, upfront SREC contracts, and SREC brokerage solutions in New Jersey. By utilizing Sol Systems’ options, customers can reduce solar installation costs anywhere from 20-40%. For more information about Sol Systems, please visit, www.solsystemscompany.com.

  • Share/Bookmark

As New Jersey Announces a New Round of Solar Funding, SRECs Remain Prominent in Project Finance

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

After several weeks of uncertainty, the New Jersey solar energy rebate program set a start date of September 1st, 2010 for the third funding cycle for solar energy systems. Known as the Renewable Energy Incentive Program (REIP), the program has been extremely popular with New Jersey homeowners looking to take advantage of the state solar incentives. In the previous round of funding in April, 2010 more than 1,000 applications were received within the first week – despite the fact that incentives had been lowered from $1.75 per watt to $1.35 for residential installations. The popularity of the program caused a delay in the new round of funding which was finally confirmed last week.

The current cycle of funding will offer $0.75 per watt in incentives limited to the first 7.5 kW of solar installations. Excluded from funding eligibility are commercially owned systems as well as all systems over 10kW. The current rates mark the lowest incentive offerings by the REIP since its inception.

Overall the REIP program has been very successful in making solar energy more affordable. However, as REIP incentives are scaled down and applications for incentives are backlogged, homeowners interested in installing solar energy are relying more heavily on SREC income to finance their solar energy systems. New Jersey SRECs remain the most valuable in the country and as state incentives decrease, SRECs will play an even larger role in making solar energy affordable to homeowners across the state.

Currently,  NJ homeowners and businesses interested in SREC financing have three different options to monetize their SRECs, each of which are available through Sol Systems: multi-year fixed-price contracts (Sol Annuity), upfront payment for SRECs (Sol Upfront), and a short-term market-based option which allows owners to sell SRECs at their current spot-market value (Sol Brokerage).

For more information on Sol Systems products, please click here. For more information on solar energy rebates and incentives in the state of New Jersey, please visit the Database of  State Incentives for Energy and Efficiency.

  • Share/Bookmark

A Call to Action

Monday, June 14th, 2010

Approximately 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana lies the epicenter of one of the worst American environmental disasters in history.  Even now, over a month after an explosion rocked the offshore drilling rig, Deepwater Horizon, and sent it to the ocean floor, oil continues to gush out of the rupture in the well that BP had contracted Transocean to drill.  Initial government estimates placed the amount of oil that was leaking at 5,000 barrels per day, though this was recently revised upwards to 20,000 to 40,000 barrels per day.  Worst case scenario estimates from BP put this figure at 162,000 barrels per day, though this was later tempered down to 60,000 barrels per day.  Despite these dangers, why are we so reliant on oil?  According to the EIA, approximately 37% of America’s primary energy consumption comes from oil, partly because the resource is readily abundant, it is relatively cheap, and it works well with our current infrastructure.  This blog seeks to address these three points:

  1. Oil may be readily available now, but it is increasingly located in hard to access and costly places.  Reserves are either held by OPEC-member countries, or are waiting to be found in environmentally challenging areas such as the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.  The Deepwater Horizon was capable of drilling in water depths in excess of 10,000 feet, however, exploring for, and developing reserves from these frontier areas are expensive endeavors.  Some of the latest offshore drilling rigs cost operators over $500,000 per day to lease.  Compare that to the estimated $27 million per day that BP is spending to clean up the Oil Spill.
  2. One of the reasons why oil is relatively cheap is because the negative externalities aren’t fully factored into the price.  BP has already spent over $1 billion trying to contain and stop the spread of oil, but the true cost of the Oil Spill, including all of the untold liabilities, is anyone’s guess.  Oil has already made landfall on parts of the U.S. coastline, adversely affecting marine life and various ecosystems.  The radius of the contamination grows with each passing day, as the leak has been met with limited success in stemming the flow.
  3. Our current infrastructure handles the transportation of the resource relatively well (barring any accidents such as the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill off the coast of Alaska).  Oil can be transported from the wellhead to a refinery through complex pipeline and delivery systems, and ultimately converted into useable gasoline for automobiles.  However, like all industries, this infrastructure was not always there, and was subsidized in order to get it into place, much like what is happening to the solar industry now.

So why not turn to an alternative energy source?  When the true costs are factored into the price of oil, solar is a cost-competitive energy source that is readily abundant.  Empirical evidence[1] supports this claim, as the market for solar panels continues to ramp up.  It is important to note that much of this growth is driven by residential homeowners putting photovoltaic panels up on their rooftops, and not just large corporations installing 1 megawatt solar farms.  However, proper incentive structures such as a national renewable portfolio standard (RPS) program with a residential carve out, is vital to develop the proper infrastructure to address our energy needs.

The time to act is now.


[1] http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/04/us-solar-sees-38-growth-in-pv-capacity-in-2009

  • Share/Bookmark

SAS New Solar Farm Coming Online

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

On October 16, 2009, SAS, a leader in business analytics software and services, announced that they would partner with groSolar and FLS Energy to develop a second solar farm on the company’s North Carolina headquarters campus.  The project should be coming online within the next few months and is slated to add 1.2 megawatts of capacity, which, in addition to SAS’s first solar farm (which came online December 17, 2008, and was designed by SunPower and installed by Southern Energy Management), would bring total capacity to 2.2 megawatts.  The incremental addition would generate approximately 1.9 million kWh/year, enough to power more than 200 homes.  Progress Energy would then purchase the generated energy for the public energy grid to go towards satisfying their regulatory requirements.

Under North Carolina law, 3.5 percent of energy sales must come from renewable sources by 2012, ultimately increasing to 12.5 percent by 2021.  As a result, utilities such as Duke Energy and Progress Energy have been relatively active in renewable investments over the past couple of years.  For example, Duke Energy entered into an agreement in 2008 to purchase the electricity produced by a 21.5 megawatt solar farm in Davidson, NC.  As a renewable energy source, solar power falls under these guidelines and fortunately for utilities, they can purchase up to 25% of their SREC requirements from out-of-state as the SREC market opens up in North Carolina this summer.

The two solar farms combined would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by more than 3,500 tons annually, the equivalent of burning 367,000 gallons of gasoline.  With the imposition of both federal and state incentives/regulations, companies are increasingly turning to solar power, as it reduces their carbon footprint, while at the same time making economic sense.  Going green no longer equates to doing so at a loss, and SAS is a prime example of a company that values both environmental stewardship and corporate profitability.

  • Share/Bookmark

Sol Systems to Present at SEIA Solar Road Show

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

Sol Systems’ President and CEO, Yuri Horwitz, will be presenting at National SEIA’s road show conference on May 10, 2010 in Philadelphia.  The conference is tailored for small businesses and designed to give them the tools and information to maximize revenue and business growth.  Topics will include the following:

  • Latest policy and market information
  • SEIA’s installer campaign, including free marketing materials and legal resources to grow
  • New financing opportunities
  • State policies to benefit installers and their customers.

Horwitz will be presenting on the solar renewable energy credit (SREC) market and SREC financing for homeowners and businesses.  Horwitz will also be addressing market factors, such as supply and demand, for the Mid-Atlantic states.

The meeting will run from 10am to 4pm and will take place at the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania at the downtown Marriot Hotel.  For those interested in registering they can explore the opportunity here or register by email with pvdivision.rsvp@seia.org.

  • Share/Bookmark